Monthly Archives: December 2024

Discussion

This research journey has been a profound personal and intellectual experience. Initially, I approached this project with a focus on identifying the technical strengths and weaknesses of Slido. However, through the process of data collection, analysis, and reflection, I have … Continue reading

Posted in ARP | Leave a comment

Tutorial: Peer Discussion in December

Qualitative data analysis can be a powerful tool for uncovering rich insights, but it also presents challenges. As Kara (2015) highlights, there is inherent creativity in qualitative analysis, particularly in thematic analysis, where themes are identified from coded data (Braun … Continue reading

Posted in ARP | Leave a comment

Protected: Project Findings

There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.

Posted in ARP | Enter your password to view comments.

Participant-Facing Documents

information sheet.docx Consent Form.docx

Posted in ARP | Leave a comment

Methods (Cont.) and Peer Feedback

Subjects The initial classroom intervention engaged ten students. In November 2024, I followed up and by scaling the project and partnering with an academic, I was able to significantly increase participant numbers reaching twenty-six students. Peer Feedback :Insights and Intervention … Continue reading

Posted in ARP | Leave a comment

Methods

Rationale of using Slido As a specialist technician in teaching and learning I chose Slido  as the interactive technology intervention for this study due to its potential to significantly enhance student engagement in the classroom. This decision was further informed … Continue reading

Posted in ARP | Leave a comment